IRR is the discount rate that makes the Net Present Value (NPV) of a project equal to zero. In simpler terms, it's the percentage return you're earning on an investment, accounting for the timing of all cash flows.
IRR is the rate at which:
You invest $10,000 in a project. It generates $4,000 in Year 1, $5,000 in Year 2, and $4,000 in Year 3.
Interpretation: This investment returns 13.7% annually. If your required return is 10%, this is a good investment (IRR > required return). If you need 15%, it's not attractive enough.
| Comparison | Decision | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| IRR > Required Return | Accept project | Generates excess returns |
| IRR = Required Return | Neutral (indifferent) | Meets minimum threshold |
| IRR < Required Return | Reject project | Returns insufficient for risk |
Also called "hurdle rate" or "cost of capital." This is the minimum return you need to justify the investment. It reflects: opportunity cost (what else you could earn), risk (higher risk needs higher return), and financing costs (if borrowing money). Typical hurdle rates: 8-12% for low risk, 15-20% for high risk.
| Metric | What It Tells You | Result Format |
|---|---|---|
| IRR | Percentage return on investment | 15.5% annual return |
| NPV | Dollar value added by investment | $45,000 value created |
Both are related. If IRR > discount rate, then NPV > 0. Use both together for best decision making.
Should we buy new equipment? Open a new location? Launch a new product line?
What return am I getting on this rental property or development project?
What's the return on acquiring and improving a company over 5 years?
Did my stock portfolio beat the market? What return did I earn on that business venture?
1. Assumes reinvestment at IRR: Unrealistic if IRR is very high
2. Multiple IRRs possible: With unconventional cash flows
3. Doesn't show project size: 50% IRR on $1,000 vs 15% on $1M
4. Can't handle different duration projects well: 30% for 1 year vs 15% for 10 years
Use IRR alongside NPV and payback period for complete picture.
Unlike most financial calculations, IRR can't be solved with simple algebra. You must use trial and error, financial calculators, or Excel.
Machine A costs $150,000
| Year | Cash Flow |
|---|---|
| 0 (now) | -$150,000 |
| 1 | $30,000 |
| 2 | $35,000 |
| 3 | $45,000 |
| 4 | $60,000 |
| 5 | $85,000 |
Try 10%:
Try 18%:
Try 17%:
Machine B costs $250,000
| Year | Machine A | Machine B |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | -$150,000 | -$250,000 |
| 1 | $30,000 | $55,000 |
| 2 | $35,000 | $65,000 |
| 3 | $45,000 | $77,000 |
| 4 | $60,000 | $99,000 |
| 5 | $85,000 | $105,000 |
| IRR | 17.02% | 15.96% |
Machine A has higher IRR (17.02% vs 15.96%). If hurdle rate is 12%, both are acceptable, but A is better on percentage return basis. However, Machine B generates more absolute dollars. This shows IRR's limitation when comparing different-sized projects.
| Project | IRR | Hurdle Rate | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retail expansion | 24% | 15% | Accept (24% > 15%) |
| New product line | 11% | 15% | Reject (11% < 15%) |
| Equipment upgrade | 15.2% | 15% | Accept (marginally) |
MIRR addresses IRR's reinvestment assumption by using two different rates:
MIRR is typically lower than IRR and more realistic, but IRR remains more commonly used.
Scenario: Restaurant owner considering second location.
The 21.3% return justifies the risk and beats alternative investments. Owner proceeds with confidence.
Scenario: Evaluating rental property purchase.
Compare to alternatives:
At 11.8% IRR, property beats bonds and savings but is close to stocks. Given hassle of being a landlord, investor might prefer stocks unless they enjoy property management.
Scenario: PE firm acquires manufacturing company.
| Year | EBITDA | Debt Service | Cash to Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $8M | $4M | $1M |
| 2 | $9M | $4M | $1.5M |
| 3 | $10M | $4M | $2M |
| 4 | $11M | $4M | $2.5M |
| 5 | $12M | $4M | $3M |
PE firm targets 20-25% IRR. At 32.1%, this is an excellent investment if projections hold.
Scenario: Comparing two mutually exclusive projects.
| Metric | Alpha | Beta |
|---|---|---|
| IRR | 30% (winner) | 18% |
| NPV | $1,818 | $18,882 (winner) |
Alpha has higher IRR but Beta creates more value ($18,882 vs $1,818). When IRR and NPV conflict, choose NPV. You'd rather have $18,882 in value than a higher percentage on a tiny project. This shows why IRR alone isn't enough for decisions.
Complete this 10-question quiz to check your understanding of IRR
If you've found a bug, or would like to contact us please click here.
Calculate.co.nz is partnered with Interest.co.nz for New Zealand's highest quality calculators and financial analysis.
© 2019–2025 Calculate.co.nz. All rights reserved.
All content on this website, including calculators, tools, source code, and design, is protected under the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). No part of this site may be reproduced, copied, distributed, stored, or used in any form without prior written permission from the owner.
All calculators and tools are provided for educational and indicative purposes only and do not constitute financial advice.
Calculate.co.nz is part of the
realtor.co.nz,
GST Calculator,
GST.co.nz, and
PAYE Calculator group.
Calculate.co.nz is also partnered with
Health Based Building and
Premium Homes to promote informed choices that lead to better long-term outcomes for Kiwi households.